What’s Manhattan Worth? A Land Values Index from 1950 to 2014

Urban EconomicsWorking Papers
J. Barr, F. Smith, S. Kulkarni
Publication year: 2014

Abstract

Using vacant land sales, we construct a land values index for Manhattan from 1950 to 2014. We find three major cycles (1950 to 1977, 1977 to 1993, and 1993 to 2009), with land values reaching their nadir in 1977, just after the city’s fiscal crisis. Overall, we find the average annual real growth rate to be 5.5%. Since 1993, land prices have risen quite dramatically, and much faster than population or employment growth, at an average annual rate of 15.8%, suggesting that barriers to entry in real estate development are causing prices to rise faster than other measures of local wellbeing. Further, we estimate the entire amount of developable land on Manhattan in 2014 was worth approximately $1.74 trillion. This would suggest an average annual return of about 6.4% since the island was first inhabited by Dutch settlers in 1626.

Population Density across the City: The Case of 1900 Manhattan

Urban EconomicsWorking Papers
J. Barr, T. Ort
Publication year: 2014

Abstract

The literature on urban spatial structure tends to focus on the distribution of residents within metropolitan areas. Little work, however, has explored population density patterns within the city. This paper focuses on a particularly important time and place in urban economic history: 1900 Manhattan. We investigate the determinants of residential spatial structure during a period of rapid population growth. We explore the effects of environmental factors (such as historic marshes and elevation), immigration patterns, the location to amenities, and employment centers. While environmental features and amenities were significant, their effects were dominated by the location choices of immigrants. On the supply side, we also explore how the grid plan affected density.

Charter School Performance in New Jersey

Urban EducationWorking Papers
J. Barr
Publication year: 2007

Abstract

This paper investigates charter school performance in New Jersey from 2000 to 2006. The analysis shows that charter schools have lower performance than public schools in the same districts on fourth grade standardized tests for Language and Math, but performance improves as charter schools gain experience. In addition, I find that the N.J. Dept. of Education is effectively closing low-performing charter schools. Lastly, regression results provide evidence of a competitive effect from charter schools to public schools.